Of course you didn't. You were too close to the epicentre
of this financial explosion. And you believe British
politicians.
It seems that it's not just crises that get flubbed, but
also the choosing of the Bank of England boss.
checkit: The Observer
Knives
out at the Bank of England as race for top job hots up
Sir
Mervyn King will not step down until next summer, but speculation over his
successor has been bubbling on for months. It's a far cry from the discreet
successions of a previous eraWilliam Keegan
Sunday 25 November 2012
Seldom
has the appointment of a governor of the Bank of England been the object of so
much speculation, and for so long before the actual event. Even now the
incumbent, Sir Mervyn King, governor since the late "Steady Eddie"
George stepped down in 2003, has seven months to run before his second term
expires on 30 June 2013.
King's
gubernatorial stewardship has been divided into two distinct periods: a happy
one and a not so happy one. After the early glory days, both as deputy governor
and later in the hotter seat, King basked in the reflected acclaim for what was
considered, for a time, to be one of Gordon
Brown's greatest historic contributions to the British polity: the granting of
operational independence in monetary policy to the Bank of England – that
is, the power to determine the official short-term rate of interest.
In
its early days, the monetary policy committee, which the governor chairs, was
widely considered a huge success, and it was King who coined the acronym
"Nice" (standing for non-inflationary continuous expansion) and
applied it to that pre-crisis "nice decade".
However,
King was always too much of a student of
economic history to believe things could go on like that, and began to downplay expectations well before the onset
of the 2007 financial crisis. Nevertheless, neither he nor the rest of the
economic establishment was prepared for the magnitude of the crisis that was to
hit them and the rest of us – a crisis during which the Bank can no longer
boast about "achieving" the inflation target, because it has not done
so for several years.
There
have also been some little local difficulties with the Bank's analysis and
forecasts of recovery – or non-recovery. King has recognised that there are
limits to the degree to which monetary policy can offset the impact of the
fiscal squeeze and other unfortunate developments.
During
the Northern Rock crisis of 2007, relations between the Treasury and the Bank
became very bad. The former chancellor, Alistair
Darling, has already vented his wrath in an instant memoir, in which he
castigated what he regards as King's slowness to grasp the extent of the
problem. In turn, King was no fan of Darling's.
The
Bank has also been widely criticised for its putative laxity in performing the
role allocated to it by Brown of guardian of financial stability. Formal
supervision of banking had been transferred to the Financial Services
Authority, but the Bank should have been a lot more alert, as King has
admitted.
......
Some
months ago, the Financial Times ran a story suggesting that the governor of the
Bank of Canada, Mark Carney, was in the running for the job. This was
vehemently denied all round. Carney's present contract runs to 2015 and he is
rumoured after that to want to go into Canadian politics. But this might have
been a case of no smoke without fire, or at least without a brief flame.
Osborne knows Carney on the international circuit; Carney is chairman of the
Financial Stability Board, the G20's key committee on reforming the financial
sector; and, as Carney once proudly told
me, Canada did not have a banking crisis.
It
is perfectly possible to reconcile the denials with the theory that Osborne in
some way sounded Carney out. But that is all water under the bridge now, and,
unless some deus (or dea) ex machina appears, the appointment will almost certainly go to one of the British
candidates.