It's always hard to make a positive story out
of the neo-liberal banking crisis of
2008 to infinity.
But Reuters is just the bunch of half-wits
to do it. Where others see the destruction
of capitalism, they see cheap loans.
Have they ever tried to get a loan?
banks are not lending to mom and pop
shops.
German taxpayers are being robbed, but
luckily for them, they seem to be happy
about it, because it's being sold to them
as Teutonic Superiority. f%&*king rubes!
beyond that :
SAVERS ARE F$%&CKED.
THE FUTURE PUBLIC MONEY OF THE
COUNTRY
IS PLEDGED TO BANKS,
CUTTING OFF GROWTH FOR REAL COMPANIES
THAT
MANUFACTURE.
MORON
MORON
checkit: REUTERS
Analysis
- What taxpayer bailouts? Euro crisis saves Germany money
German
Chancellor Angela Merkel and Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta pose for
photographers after a news conference at the Chancellery in Berlin, April 30,
2013. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch
By
Jan Strupczewski
BRUSSELS
| Thu May 2, 2013 9:12am BST
(Reuters)
- Throughout Europe's debt crisis, northern European leaders have often said
they will not stand for taxpayers having to fork out for other countries'
problems, and the notion of "taxpayer-funded bailouts" has taken
root.
Yet
despite three-and-a-half years of debt and banking turmoil, with bailouts
totalling more than 400 billion euros, northern euro zone taxpayers have not
actually lost a cent.
What
is more, governments in Germany, Finland, Austria, the Netherlands and France
have saved billions of euros thanks to a sharp fall in how much they pay to
raise money in financial markets since their borrowing costs have dropped
steeply.
But
that has not prevented the image taking root in voters' minds of hard working
northern Europeans putting money on the line to rescue profligate, work-shy
southerners, fuelling resentment and undermining Europe's unity.
In
the run up to German elections in September, that resentment is only likely to
grow, and Chancellor Angela Merkel, bidding for a third term in office, will
have to reaffirm her commitment to protect voters from potential losses.
But
the truth remains that German taxpayers, as well as those in Finland, the
Netherlands and elsewhere, are no worse off at all, and their finance
ministries have racked up savings.
"As
an unintentional consequence of the crisis, Finland has benefited
enormously," said Martti Salmi, the head of international and EU affairs
at Finland's ministry of finance.
"We
have not lost a cent so far," he told Reuters. "The same as for
Germany very much holds for Finland."
In
fact, German officials are well aware of their stronger financing position, the
result of a more than two percentage point fall in borrowing costs, even as
politicians continue to lament the risks being piled on German taxpayers.
When
giving presentations in Germany, Klaus Regling, the German who heads the euro
zone's permanent bailout fund, often cites two studies that show that Berlin
has reaped substantial savings as an unintended consequence of the crisis.
One
study, by German insurance giant Allianz (ALVG.DE), has calculated that Berlin
saved 10.2 billion euros in 2010-2012 because of lower borrowing costs, as
yields on its 10-year bonds fell from 3.39 percent to 1.18 percent now.
The
other study, by Jens Boysen-Hogrefe of the IfW economic institute, suggests
that the German federal budget saved 8.6 billion euros in 2011 due to low ECB
interest rates and the safe-haven impact of investors putting money into
Germany.
Those
savings rose to 9.6 billion in 2012 and the safe-haven effect will alone be
worth 2 billion in 2013, IfW said.
"If
we add up the interest rate advantages gained in the period 2010 to 2012 and
those that Germany will benefit from in the years to come, we arrive at
cumulative interest relief for the German budget of an estimated 67 billion
euros," Allianz said in a paper published last September.
"(That
is) enough to slash around 3 percentage points off Germany's government debt
ratio," which reaps further saving.
Finland,
the Netherlands, Austria and France may not have gained as much as Germany, but
have also seen a substantial decline in borrowing costs over the crisis period....