Friday 28 December 2012

Hedge Funds expand into Piracy

the Elliot Navy has taken on the Argentines.

What happens when you roll the dice and hope that the
US courts will enforce your vulturing of Argentina's debt?
 
Take their assets in a foreign port.
Of course, then you have to hire a pirate
captain and a swashbuckling crew.
Aye! Matey
 
 
checkit:  zerohedge
Argentina Ignores US Court Decision, Will Not Pay Elliott And Holdouts
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/18/2012 13:18 -0500
Several weeks ago we summarized the highly entertaining (if largely futile) fight between naval commodore second class Paul Singer of Her Majesty's Elliott Capital Navy, and the defaulted and soon to be re-defaulted state of Argentina. The punchline, much to the chagrin of all those other "sophisticated" bloggers who read so very much into the recent decision of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, was the following: "What this really means is that Western courts have decided that Elliott has not been stripped of pre-petition rights despite, or rather in spite of, holding out, and is entitled to collecting up to par recovery. There is one problem: there is absolutely no enforcement mechanism! And therein lies the rub: because how does a court located on Pearl Street in New York order the Argentina State Treasurer located in Buenos Aires to wire a payment on bonds, via intermediary banks, that Argentina effectively has disowned? It can't." Today, Argentina just made it very clear that once again those desperate for page views by analyzing and overanalyzing an utterly meaningless court decision's implications for rogue sovereign debtor will have to try even harder, following Reuters' report confirming precisely what we said would happen - that Argentina would completely ignore the appeals court decision, and not pay holdout, read Elliott, bondholders.
Now comes the realization that in a broke sovereign world, pretty much anything goes, unless enforced by trade (or naval) blockades, and/or, well, war. And as long as the impaired party is simply a uber-prosperous hedge fund, the probability of either happening is negligible. Said party, however, may continue confiscating Argentinian ships at will: hopefully it is capable of creating an efficient clearing market for three-mast frigates.


Police silencers no longer working in Spain

Cops in Spain, and Greece, have promised the people that they'll
start arresting bankers. They also apologised for braining
the Occupiers.

when 1 year ago they were moles inside protests:

[government "anarchist" moles discovered at protest in Barcelona, 2011]

In Greece, masked anarchist molotov-chuckers have coffee break with the police:


Now, they have seen the light. They will no longer
be the pawns of their corrupt government.
Police have made announcements in both Spain and Greece.
Apology accepted.
Be excellent to one another!

Greek police ready the trap door for the politicians, in front of parliamentary
palace


checkit:  zerohedge

Protesting Spanish Cops: "Forgive Us For Not Arresting Those Truly Responsible For This Crisis: Bankers & Politicians"

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/18/2012 09:36 -0500

Yesterday, in what is an appetizer to the great 2013 convergence trade (that, between the now thoroughly dead Greek and the Spanish economy, which is rapidly getting there, of course), several thousand Spanish policemen took the streets of Madrid protesting the latest round of austerity, which included frozen pensions and the elimination of the Christmas bonus (they will have many more opportunities to protest not only the loss of any future upside, but the eventual cut of existing wages and entitlements). As RT reports, protesters blew whistles, shouted slogans, and carried anti-austerity banners as they marched through the city centre to the interior ministry. But perhaps the most telling message read on one of the slogans, was the following: "Citizens! Forgive us for not arresting those truly responsible for this crisis: bankers and politicians."

And there you have the entire current clusterfuck summarized in one simple sentence: because as long as those responsible for the ongoing economic collapse, which will inevitably end in war as many have observed, Kyle Bass most recently, are not only not arrested but preserve their positions of power, any and all change will merely be cosmetic and any real change will only affect the bank accounts of the global middle class which are slowly but surely drained to zero.

FATCA has a fat chance of catching fatcats

Every government is now hurriedly doing their Keystone cops routine
now that Occupy has taken the lead in justice-making.
Commissions and commissions about commissions are
not good enough, so they actually have to be seen doing
something.

more later

British financial media couldn't see crisis inside the epicentre

Everything looks peachy in the eye of a storm.

more soon

Republicans listened to Rove because ?

A) they're idiots
B) he told them (secretly) that he has the magic poison for democracy
C) none of them, including Rove had heard of Anonymous
D) they're evil despots-in-waiting

ok. I threw the last one in for fun

Well, they just aren't democrats. They wanted to steal it
just like Dumbya Bush.

checkit:  Daily beast

Republicans Allowed Karl Rove to Mislead Them Again
Nov 16, 2012 11:05 PM EST
A willing suspension of disbelief allowed the GOP faithful to see victory in all the wrong places, writes Matt Latimer.[SICK FUCK]

The crime: Mitt Romney’s inexplicable defeat. The suspects: everybody in the world, except the people who really deserve it.

The first obvious target, of course, is Mitt Romney himself, who managed to lose to a president with one of the worst economic records in memory. Then eyes turned to Romney’s campaign staff, which somehow could not turn a vibrant, brilliant, Cary Grant–in–the–making into the next president of the United States. Perhaps the fault lies with President Obama, who only pretended that nobody in America liked him. Or it was those tricky young people, who somehow managed to vote when everyone assumed they were too lazy to bother. Perhaps it was Nate Silver and his crazy belief in “theory” and “science.” Or the latest suspects: Martha Raddatz and Candy Crowley in the conservatory with the lead pipe.

Personally I love scapegoating as much as the next guy—was Jar Jar Binks really the only reason the Star Wars prequels were terrible?—but I can’t let them pin this one on Martha and Candy. Nor can I allow Republicans to pull an O.J.—stopping at nothing until they find the “real killers” of the 2012 campaign.

We know where they are. We know who they are. We’ve been here before. Years ago, as an escapee of the George W. Bush administration, I wrote a whole book about it. The only question is whether or not enough Republicans want to do anything to solve the problem.


This is not the first election cycle in which Republicans have been shell-shocked by reality. Six years earlier, Republicans across the country believed they would retain control of the House and Senate. That’s because Karl Rove and his acolytes in the Bush administration and the Republican Party told us so.

All the polls were wrong, they said. They were hopelessly biased or skewed by liberal media organizations out to suppress the vote. Republicans were more popular than people thought. Billionaire donors were urged to stick with the party and its leadership or pay the price. Anyone who disagreed with their thinking, including fellow Republicans, was a traitor, or a liar, or a dupe. Say, any of that sound familiar?

latimer-gop-finger-pointing-tease
 
American political consultant Karl Rove is seen at the Tampa Bay Times Forum during final preparations for the opening of the Republican National Convention on Aug. 27. (Brendan Smialowski / AFP / Getty Images)


In 2008, Republicans again preached the gospel of Rove and his allies—Ed Gillespie, Dana Perino, and basically everyone tied to American Crossroads. They told us that only John McCain could defeat this amateur, Barack Obama. Obama was too liberal for the electorate, they said. He had too much baggage. The country liked the Bush administration’s approach more than the “biased” polls let on. McCain was a perfect nominee because he was not an ideologue. (At one point after his loss to Bush in 2000, McCain even flirted with being a Democrat.) This guy was back and forth on so many issues that nobody was ever certain where he might land. That made him an ideal candidate to reach out to moderates and independents. Say, any of that sound familiar?


Saturday 22 December 2012

Ancient cultures show the way: China & Greece

While some are fearing that the Great Western Democracies will
become like China's system of National Communism, I think
that Greece is also competing by showing how a Gang of Oligarchs
can run everything.
Government in-bedded with business & spooning
Businesses having newspapers/tv as money-losing mouthpiece

This is what Greece teaches us. Nothing about debt, just governance.

You're beginning to see this (cuz you been slumbering) in the
Murdoch Escapades of late, like HackGate and the attempted
buying of the Republican Candidate (coming soon), that 
Murdoch's media buddies are rampantly ignoring.

Any 5-year-old raised on Batman and Spiderman
can recognise Gotham when he sees it

When I look at Rupe Murdoch,
I see the Joker.

When I find the Murdoch story, I'll post it above, under the title of
The Joker Strikes Again- to the Blogmobile!

For now, here's part of the Reuters story:

Read 'em: Reuters
Special Report: Greece's triangle of power
 
the country's crisis, say critics.

By Stephen Grey and Dina Kyriakidou
ATHENS (Reuters) - In late 2011 the Greek finance minister made an impassioned plea for help to rescue his country from financial ruin.
"We need a national collective effort: all of us have to carry the burden together," announced Evangelos Venizelos, who has since become leader of the socialist party PASOK. "We need something that will be fair and socially acceptable."
It was meant to be a call to arms; it ended up highlighting a key weakness in Greece's attempts to reform.
Venizelos' idea was a new tax on property, levied via electricity bills to make it hard to dodge. The public were furious and the press echoed the outrage, labeling the tax ‘haratsi' after a hated levy the Ottomans once imposed on Greeks. The name stuck and George Papandreou, then prime minister, felt compelled to plead with voters: "Let's all lose something so that we don't lose everything."



Monday 10 December 2012

Applied Talebbing- or How to cause a black swan

For those who were impressed with the idea that
"a black swan can come along at any moment",
why wait for one. Create one yourself.

Taleb himself thinks that bottom-up
trial and error is the way to go. No use
waiting for a theory to end this cataclysm.
We'll be into the 22nd before anybody from
a university saves humanity.
I guess humanity will have to do the saving.

There's a great documentary on HFT trading
[I'll get it later]
that showed how a misreading of the news
media (because HFT computers crunch news,
as well as savings, and countries)
caused a flash crash two years ago.

Only the SEC in the US know who did it,
but they're not talking.

Anyway, here's more on how to
trip the algos
This may be the only option for mathematically-
inclined justice freaks, or say, Anonymous to 
try to kick off the cataclysm that we know the 
economy needs. We can feed on the bankers livers
with some farva beans and a glass of Chianti, and get
back to life like it was before 2008.

Let's cut to the video [check 22:50]


22:50 Algos misread a story

Let us pray for the Mother of all Swans:

my dear old Swanee

Saturday 8 December 2012

In this time of Autumn Austerity, do you know where bankers have spent their money?

Lobbying government for more tax loopholes, perhaps?

i just want to see what welfare moochers look like.
They tend to be found in dangerous capitalistic
office towers, stealing money from the market.

more later

Thursday 29 November 2012

Canuck goalie stops the buck, at Bank of England

I've always said, us Canucks are good with figures.
Some of us are even good with numbers.

This is related to Mark Carney, who is set to become
the new capo at the Bank of England.

He was a backup goalie on Harvard's hockey team,
while studying. That usually means a free education, too.

Good, frugal Canucks.

However, he may soon be called the Autumn Guy, over here
because that's what they call Fall, over here. Who's gonna
take the fall for all this banking fraud? The colonial.

Although, it must be said that nobody thought that
Osbourne was nuts, on this call anyway.
It's because Canada received most of the Scottish immigrants,
and their frugality and "friendliness" have been with us
ever since.

Max Keiser said that it's rather ironic that the guy is named
Carney, seeing as the BoE is carnie side-show freak show.
Bearded ladies and so on. Bernanke, too.


Being the goalie and being the director of the BoE are similar
experiences. You're part of a team, but you're left by yourself,
especially if you let an easy one go by.
Mervyn had it easy, because he was a Sir, in a deferent
country. The colonial will get flayed.

I think Carney has about the same odds as a soccer goalie
has on a penalty shot, in an away game.
you get my drift?

Tuesday 27 November 2012

I know why Taleb is being ignored by oligarchs


TALEB’S BLACK SWAN WAS A BLACK SWAN
ITSELF,  AND PROPHETIC, 3 MONTHS BEFORE
THE CRISIS.
Perhaps stockbrokers picked up his book and then
crapped themselves, thinking "it could happen any day",
like Chicken Little.
It's the equivalent of that butterfly in the Amazon that impudently
flapped its wings, causing a tsunami in London. 

Now Taleb is big in big circles. Polticians. Bankers. 
NOW PEOPLE WANT TO SUCK HIS ZEITGEIST,
THINKING IT WILL MAKE THEM BETTER or
AT LEAST GIVE THEM STH to TALK ABOUT OVER CANAPES.

But, they won't take his advice. David Cameron talks to him.
In fact, Cameron has had Taleb as a guru since 2009.
Now papers and CNBC and assorted other lazy journalists
are choosing what of Taleb's to believe and publicise.

So, we get "Taleb thinks Europe should become more like
Switzerland". Ya, more guns and more aggressive banker
mafia stifling dissent. I'm beginning to think that Hitler should
have ransacked Switzerland and forgotten about France.

Anyway, two things: David Cameron, and then the oligarchy

David Cameron, as a well-"educated" Oxford grad knows
how to behave towards a guru. He figured out quickly how
to ingratiate himself to Taleb, so Taleb now "likes" Just Dave.
He's blowing smoke up your ass, Nassim.
He's using you for everything you can give him. And because
you want to be heard and followed, he gives you the
impression that he's following you. Of course, he isn't.
The banks? What about them? Dave's never gonna
squash the banks. Did you hear Osborne, yesterday?

anti-fragile. 
their asses are fragile. 
Poke them, or their
asses, and they fart.


NOW, as for the oligarchs, like the ones who invite Taleb
to speak, and he "kicks their asses and then gets paid,"
and  yet they don't follow his ideas. Why?

Because of the black swan line of bull, Taleb's like
the lion that can bite your head off. To show that you're
brave, you rattle the lion's cage or make faces at it,
from a safe distance. No matter what Taleb says,
the banks keep going. So, actually they're mocking
Taleb. He's a trained circus lion with no fangs.

Secondly, and this is risky, they believe they've figured
out his logic, even if he didn't actually say it. Taleb says
that modernity is too complex, so black swans happen.
ok. What have central bankers been doing since 2008?
Every time they've found something that could cause
liquidity to stall, they've thrown money at it. Right?
Well, that's because they think they can check all
the variables, therefore, there will be no black swans.
I suppose they'll be proven wrong, but so far, they're
right. The parade is still going forward, on three wheels,
but forward.
It has required fascistic central planning, with dictats
from Washington. The Bernank and Geithner have
been orchestrating reverse-socialism and it appears
that nothing can stop them.
So, pre-2008, the only problem was that everybody
was too naive. Now they've got a stranglehold on the
economy. They decide who lives or dies.
That's they don't listen to Taleb. That, and the fact
that they all want their fat bonuses and bribes, so
they never , EeeeeVER considered choking the banks.

Here's the Observer article, with notes by me:

Checkit: Observer


Nassim Taleb: my rules for life
The controversial thinker who predicted the 2008 financial crisis hates bankers, academics and journalists. He's also a man of mystery – he eats like a caveman, and goes to bed at 8pm. We took the risk of meeting him
       Carole Cadwalladr
        Saturday 24 November 2012 12.30 GMT

How much does Nassim Taleb dislike journalists? Let me count the ways. "An erudite is someone who displays less than he knows; a journalist or consultant the opposite." "This business of journalism is about pure entertainment, not the search for the truth." "Most so-called writers keep writing and writing with the hope, some day, to find something to say." He disliked them before, but after he predicted the financial crash in his 2007 book, The Black Swan, a book that became a global bestseller, his antipathy reached new heights. He has dozens and dozens of quotes on the subject, and if that's too obtuse for us non-erudites, his online home page puts it even plainer: "I beg journalists and members of the media to leave me alone."
    Antifragile: How to Live in a World We Don't Understand
    by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
He's not wildly keen on appointments either. In his new book, Antifragile, he writes that he never makes them because a date in the calendar "makes me feel like a prisoner".
So imagine, if you will, how keenly he must be looking forward to the prospect of a pre-arranged appointment to meet me, a journalist. I approach our lunch meeting, at the Polytechnic Institute of New York University where he's the "distinguished professor of risk engineering", as one might approach a sleeping bear: gingerly. And with a certain degree of fear. And yet there he is, striding into the faculty lobby in a jacket and Steve Jobs turtleneck ("I want you to write down that I started wearing them before he did. I want that to be known."), smiling and effusive.
...In print, the hating and despising is there for all to see: he's forever having spats and fights. When he's not slagging off the Nobel prize for economics (a "fraud"), [Amen- Costick67] bankers ("I have a physical allergy to them") and the academic establishment (he has it in for something he calls the "Soviet-Harvard illusion"), he's trading blows with Steven Pinker ("clueless")[Full marks- Costick67], and a random reviewer on Amazon, who he took to his Twitter stream to berate. And this is just in the last week.
And yet here he is, chatting away, surprisingly friendly and approachable. When I say as much as we walk to the restaurant, he asks, "What do you mean?"
"In your book, you're quite…" and I struggle to find the right word, "grumpy".
He shrugs. "When you write, you don't have the social constraints of having people in front of you, so you talk about abstract matters."
.... and a plate of "pasta without pasta" (though strictly speaking you could call it "mixed vegetables and chicken"), and attacks the bread basket "because it doesn't have any calories here in Brooklyn".
But then, having read his latest book, I actually know an awful lot about his diet. How he doesn't eat sugar, any fruits which "don't have a Greek or Hebrew name" or any liquid which is less than 1,000 years [OF HISTORY. no, he's not stashing 1000-year-old wine- Costick67] old. Just as I know that he doesn't like air-conditioning, soccer moms, sunscreen and copy editors. That he believes the "non-natural" has to prove its harmlessness[Monsanto. full marks- Costick67]. That America tranquillises its children with drugs and pathologises sadness. That he values honour above all things, banging on about it so much that at times he comes across as a medieval knight who's got lost somewhere in the space-time continuum. And that several times a week he goes and lifts weights in a basement gym with a bunch of doormen.
He says that after the financial crisis he received "all manner of threats" and at one time was advised to "stock up on bodyguards". Instead, "I found it more appealing to look like one". Now, he writes, when he's harassed by limo drivers in the arrival hall at JFK, "I calmly tell them to fuck off."[LIMO DRIVERS HAVEN’T BEEN IN A WAR- Costick67]
Taleb started out as a trader, worked as a quantitative analyst and ran his own investment firm, but the more he studied statistics, the more he became convinced that the entire financial system was a keg of dynamite that was ready to blow. In The Black Swan he argued that modernity is too complex to understand, and "Black Swan" events – hitherto unknown and unpredicted shocks – will always occur.
What's more, because of the complexity of the system, if one bank went down, they all would. The book sold 3m copies. And months later, of course, this was more or less exactly what happened [THE BOOK WAS THE BLACK SWAN. ONE FISH WHO SWAM AGAINST THE CURRENT- Costick67]. Overnight, he went from lone-voice-in-the-wilderness, spouting off-the-wall theories, to the great seer of the modern age.[STRANGE HOW SAYING THE OBVIOUS TO THE OBLIVIOUS OCCASIONALLY MAKES YOU FAMOUS- Costick67]
Antifragile, the follow-up, is his most important work so far, he says. It takes the central idea of The Black Swan and expands it to encompass almost every other aspect of life, from the 19th century rise of the nation state to what to eat for breakfast (fresh air, as a general rule).
As you might suspect, it's a great, baggy, idiosyncratic doorstopper of a book. Reading it, I spend the first 200 pages or so mildly confused. "I couldn't figure out what genre it was," I tell him. "Forget the genre!" he says. I'd been expecting a popular science-style read, a Freakonomics or a Nudge. And then I realised it's actually a philosophical treatise [and everything in his knicker drawer- Costick67].
"Exactly!" says Taleb. Once you get over the idea that you're reading some sort of popular economics book and realise that it's basically Nassim Taleb's Rules for Life, it's actually rather enjoyable. Highly eccentric, it's true, but very readable and something like a chivalric code d'honneur for the 21st century. Modern life is akin to a chronic stress injury, he says. And the way to combat it is to embrace randomness in all its forms: live true to your principles, don't sell your soul and watch out for the carbohydrates.
What's more, for all the barmy passages involving an invented character called Fat Tony engaging in a Socratic dialogue with another invented character called Nero Tulip (a very thinly disguised Taleb), and the fact that at one point he does actually seem to compare himself to Jesus – they're both prophets who came from the east – he does talk a lot of what I can only describe as sense.
His justification for all this is that "experience is devoid of the cherry-picking that we find in studies". More than anything else, he believes in having "skin in the game". When, for example, he warned about the fragility of the banking system in The Black Swan, "I was betting on its collapse". His point is that he's always put his money where his mouth is, and it's this principle – and the lack of it – that is still, he believes, the fundamental problem with the entire banking system.
In the book he calls this "Hammurabi's Code", a 3,800-year-old Babylonian law that stipulated that if a building collapses and kills someone, the builder should be put to death. Whereas, for bankers, "there is no downside". The bonus system means that "they're paid billions in compensation". And if their bets lose, it's the taxpayers who pay.
He cites, not unadmiringly, the tradition in Catalonia where they would "behead bankers in front of their banks". So, what's changed, I asked, since he wrote the book, and the system collapsed?
"Nothing. Nothing has changed. Zero. Now I switch to writing technical papers. There is some hope, the Bank of England wants to implement antifragility.[THEY’RE PULLING HIS DICK- Costick67] Mervyn King [the governor of the Bank of England] spoke about it at the LSE. And I've done work for the IMF…"
But nothing's changed?
"I no longer care about the financial system. I gave them my roadmap. OK? Thanks, bye. I've no idea what's going on. I'm disconnected. I'm totally disengaged. People read 3m copies of The Black Swan. The bulk of them before the crisis. And people love it. They agree with it. They invite me to dinner. And they don't do anything about it.[THEY’RE JUST INTO SUCKING THE ZEITGEIST, and they are listening, or so they think. They took his idea that modernity is too complex and cannot be controlled. Now they’re trying to control everything. That’s why they’ve become ever more fascistic. Ever more central planning- Costick67]
"You have to pull back and let the system destroy itself, and then come back. That's Seneca's recommendation. He's the one who says that the sage should let the republic destroy itself."
But doesn't that frustrate you? [awesome question to ask a big ego. Oscar! & Pulitzer. Next thing you'll ask him if his farts change the trade winds- Costick67]
"It did. Now it doesn't. But if you continue talking about it I will get frustrated so let's switch."
He means it too. There's a bit of an edge to the statement, so I ask him about David Cameron instead and he immediately relaxes. "He's a great guy," he says. There's some sort of mutual appreciation which goes on between the modern Conservative party and Taleb. He name-checks Steve Hilton (Cameron's former head of strategy) and Rohan Silva (one of his special advisers) and says they're "buddies".
"We had lunch once and realised we were talking the same language and it went from there. I never mention it in anything."
Well, actually, I say, you mention it in the book.
Fraser Nelson, the editor of the Spectator, says that Taleb "is probably the closest thing Cameron has to a guru". Why does Taleb think that is?
"Because they care about risk. Labour don't care." [THEY’RE LYING TO TALEB, & SUCKING UP TO HIM- Costick67]
...The "arguments" are that size, in Taleb's view, matters. Bigger means more complex, means more prone to failure [ESP. SINCE EVEN BIG COMPANIES ARE HAVING TROUBLE GETTING A LOAN. GOTTA HAVE SOMEONE ON THE INSIDE- Costick67]. Or, as he puts it, "fragile". It's what made – still makes – the banking system so vulnerable, in his view. It needs to be more "antifragile". This isn't the same as robust, he explains, which means it can simply take the knocks. "Antifragile" is when something is actually strengthened by the knocks.
He gives all sorts of examples of this in the book. A clerk in a large company is fragile as he has only one source of income. A taxi driver is antifragile. A banker is fragile. A prostitute is antifragile. General Petraeus is fragile: a single indiscretion was enough to destroy his career. Boris Johnson is antifragile: a whole string of scandals has actually enhanced his reputation. "He's smart enough to present himself as sort of 'This is how I am'," says Taleb. London, too, seems to be antifragile. The global financial crisis was just another boost: a safe haven for foreign real-estate cash.
In Taleb's view, small is beautiful. Corporate mergers never work. "It's not a good idea being large during difficult times." And, when companies think otherwise, it's the "hubris hypothesis". After reading this section of the book I flick to the cover to check who printed it: Allen Lane, an imprint of Penguin. Which has recently merged with Random House to create one big mega-publishing company.
"Your publishers haven't actually read your book, have they?" I say. "If they're smart enough they can keep the companies separate," he says, not very convincingly. And anyway, there's really no evidence that they are smart enough.
In The Black Swan, one of Taleb's great examples of "non-linearity", or Black Swan behaviour, was blockbusters. There's no predicting what will be the next breakout success, or next year's 50 Shades of Grey, but when they take off, they fly off the charts, as The Black Swan did. The book itself was a Black Swan phenomenon. As Taleb is fond of pointing out – and as the small print beneath advertisements for mutual funds states – past performance is no indicator of future growth. Penguin seemed to have overlooked this point too since they paid him an astonishing $4m advance for this book.
"They made a lot of money from Black Swan so to them it's not too bad a risk," he says, but I feel it's more a guest's politeness towards their host than anything else. Anyway, the money was not, he says, "a major part of my income at the time". In 1987 he made a great deal of money shorting the financial crash, and millions more during the 2008 meltdown. It's his "fuck you" money that allows him to do exactly what he wants, when he wants, beholden to no one.
... Taleb doesn't actually seem to be one of them. Most people, however wealthy, like to be paid for doing their job. But not Taleb. He doesn't actually take a salary from NYU. "Well, I keep the minimum. I give back the rest. So if, tomorrow morning, they say 'fuck you', I'm gone."
Then again this may be because as well as hating journalists and bankers, he's almost as damning about academics.
"But you are one!" I point out.
"Not really. I'm an independent scholar, practically speaking."
He's also largely an autodidact. He has higher degrees but most of his working life was spent outside academia, and much of his thinking is rooted not in 21st-century mathematics but the classics. He quotes them endlessly, hero-worships Seneca and refers to himself as a "stoic".[THAT’S HOW Classically-trained CAMERON GRABS HIM BY THE NOSE- Costick67]
Not everyone, it has to be said, is a fan of the high style. Jamie Whyte in Standpoint magazine reflects the criticism of many when he accuses Taleb of "inflating" the significance of his observations with "an absurdly combative and grandiose writing style", and points out that publishing a book of aphorisms, as Taleb did last year, is "usually completed by someone else after one's death".
But Taleb is not someone who lacks confidence. He was born and brought up in Lebanon, his family rich and influential Greek Orthodox believers, a minority religion even in a country of minority religions. His grandfather and great-grandfather were deputy prime ministers, and his great-great-great-great grandfather was the governor of Ottoman Mount Lebanon.
In Antifragile he tells a story about his father, a doctor, a scholar and man with "a large ego and immense dignity who commanded respect". At some point during the civil war, he stopped at a checkpoint where a militiaman treated him disrespectfully. "My father refused to comply and the gunman shot him in the back."
It's a pretty astonishing story, and when I ask Taleb about it, he says: "I have very similar stories, too, but I chose not to tell them." What do you mean? He prevaricates and then talks about "personal stories about taking a stand but I don't want to wander into near-eastern politics".
....It's too neat a formulation to ascribe Taleb's Lebanese upbringing and his war-scarred teenage years as the source for his theories on randomness and instability. Malcolm Gladwell profiled him in the New Yorker more than a decade ago, and attributed his belief in Black Swans to having experienced them (not just in the Lebanese war but also in a bout of non-smoking-related throat cancer).
But Taleb shakes his head. "That article was wrong about me," he says. "That's why you think I'm gloomy."
...When the financial journalist Michael Lewis profiled a collection of individuals who, like Taleb, saw the crash coming and shorted the market, he described them as "social misfits". It takes a certain sort of personality to stand apart from the herd. And Taleb's cantankerousness, his propensity for picking fights, and for taking stands does also seem to be the source of his greatest triumphs. It was horrible, though, he says.
"Really horrible. Between 2004 and 2008 were the worst years of my life. Everybody thought I was an idiot. And I knew that. But at the same time I couldn't change my mind to fit in. So you have this dilemma: my behaviour isn't impacted by what people think of me, but I have the pain of it.
"People made fun of me. I don't know if you can still find it on the web but you would not believe how much crap was written about me. The finance industry hates me with a passion."
You must have felt incredibly vindicated?
"Vindication doesn't pay back. Nobody likes you because you were right. This is why I'm glad I made the shekels."
Anyway, Taleb is a fighter. And like the Roman generals, he believes in going into battle, leading from the front. It's why he thinks Tony Blair is a coward and a knave: "He's a very dishonourable fellow [historically-important corruption- Costick67]. Gordon Brown is an idiot [Goal!- Costick67]. But Blair was dishonourable." He believes that people should be banned from making money from having been in public office. And he especially despises journalists who made the case for war on Iraq, like the New York Times's Thomas Friedman, "a serial criminal" who he says makes him feel physically sick.
It's back to his "skin in the game" beliefs. If you're going to make the case for war, you need to have at least one direct descendant who stands to lose his life from the decision[NOT THE PARADE OF ROYALS IN GRAND OCCUPATIONS. WILLY HAS HANDLERS BOTH WITH AND BACK HOME. MORE STRATEGY FOR HIS PLACEMENT THAN MOST OF THE WARS HE FINDS HIMSELF IN. NOTE THE SHOCK WHEN A BOMB WAS THROWN OVER THE WALL AT THE CAMP IN AFGHANISTAN, SOME DOZENS OF METRES FROM HARRY- Costick67]. And while some may wonder why they need a lecture on ethics from an ex-city trader, it's hard to argue with. Though it's easy enough to argue about more or less anything else. He won't confirm or deny the existence of a Mrs Taleb. And he has a son and daughter "who are exactly like me" – but that's all he'll say about them. "I'm a private intellectual, not a public one."
But you write about parenting at one point, I say. And you've written a book about how to live.
"Exactly. Here's how to live: keep your public life separate from your private life."
He makes me order tiramisu and then eats half of it, but then no food has passed his lips for about 17 hours, he says. Incorporating randomness into his life has led him to adopt the style of eating known as "paleo". Roughly speaking, this means that if a caveman wouldn't have eaten it, then you don't. Except tiramisu. And intermittent fasting is recommended as a way of mimicking the effects of, say, failing to catch a sabre-toothed tiger.
...But isn't it hypocritical to be so anti-artsy fartsy when you are artsy fartsy?
"I'm not. I'm mathematical not artsy."
"But you go on about your private library. You say you spend at least 30 hours a week reading. You love the classics."
"Yes, but it doesn't mean I'm artsy. I don't hang around with artsy people. I have zero literary friends."
I wouldn't want to get into a Twitter catfight with Nassim Taleb. Or be a banker in the audience when he gives one of his talks. "They pay me tens of thousands of dollars to come and rip them apart."[THAT’S BANKERS’ FEAR THERAPY. LION’S MOUTH, IF GOVERNMENTS LISTENED TO TALEB. BANKERS REALISE IT’S JUST WORDS AND THEY’RE STILL STANDING.-Costick67]

Sunday 25 November 2012

don't tell America. they might invade

can't have people being happy with life. Gotta get them
to work in precarious jobs with no union coverage
and no health care. Then they'll be desperate to buy
our Chinese-made crap.

Anyway, there may be other ways than the American one.

But they're just socialist losers, anyway. Leave them in
their deluded state. pffft!

Let's have a look: Bloomberg
U.S. Prosperity Slides in Index That Ranks Norway No. 1
By Simon Kennedy - Oct 30, 2012 12:01 AM
The U.S. slid from the top ten most prosperous nations for the first time in a league table which ranked three Scandinavian nations the best for wealth and wellbeing.
The U.S. slid from the top ten most prosperous nations for the first time in a league table which ranked three Scandinavian nations the best for wealth and wellbeing.
The U.S. fell to 12th position from 10th in the Legatum Institute’s annual prosperity index amid increased doubts about the health of its economy and ability of politicians. Norway, Denmark and Sweden were declared the most prosperous in the index, published in London today.
With the presidential election just a week away, the research group said the standing of the U.S. economy has deteriorated to beneath that of 19 rivals. The report also showed that respect for the government has fallen, fewer Americans perceive working hard gets you ahead, while companies face higher startup costs and the export of high-technology products is dropping.
“As the U.S. struggles to reclaim the building blocks of the American Dream, now is a good time to consider who is best placed to lead the country back to prosperity and compete with the more agile countries,” Jeffrey Gedmin, the Legatum Institute’s president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
The six-year-old Legatum Prosperity Index is a study of wealth and wellbeing in 142 countries, based on eight categories such as economic strength, education and governance. Covering 96 percent of the world’s population, it is an attempt to broaden measurement of a nation’s economic health beyond indicators such as gross domestic product.
The Legatum Institute is the public policy research arm of the Legatum Group, a Dubai-based private investment group founded in 2006 by New Zealand billionaire Christopher Chandler.
Global Prosperity
The report shows that even amid the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, global prosperity has increased across all regions in the past four years, although the sense of safety and security is decreasing amid tension in the Middle East and fear of crime in Latin America.
Norway and Denmark retained the pole positions they held last year in the overall prosperity measure, while Sweden leapfrogged Australia and New Zealand into third. Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Ireland rounded out the top ten. The Central African Republic was ranked bottom.
In its sub-indexes, Legatum named Switzerland the strongest economy and home to the best system of governance. Denmark is the most entrepreneurial and New Zealand has the best education, while health is best in Luxembourg and Iceland is the safest. Canadians enjoy the most personal freedom and Norwegians have the greatest social capital.
Hard Work
With President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney tussling for the White House, Legatum said the U.S. economy declined two places from last year to 20th. It found that 89 percent of Americans believe hard work produces results, up from 88 percent last year, and the government’s approval rate dropped to 39 percent from 42 percent.
Plagued by the euro-area debt crisis, 24 out of 33 European nations have witnessed a decline in their economic score since 2009, according to Legatum. On the prosperity scale, Greece recorded the biggest drop in 2012, falling 10 places since 2009 to 49th. Spain held on to 23rd place.
The U.K remained 13th, one place ahead of Germany, and Legatum predicted it will overtake the U.S. by 2014 as it scores well for entrepreneurship and governance. Nevertheless, the status of its economy remains a weakness as it slid five places to 26th on that score and job satisfaction is low.
Asian Scores
In Asia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan all ranked in the top ten for their economies and the top 20 overall. So-called tiger cub economies Vietnam and Indonesia also rose. Indonesia experienced the largest gain in prosperity of any country since 2009, jumping 26 positions to 63rd.
Switzerland, Norway and Singapore topped the economy sub- index, which measures satisfaction with the economy and expectations for it, the efficiency of the financial sector and foundations for growth. In a gauge of entrepreneurship, Denmark ran ahead of Sweden and Finland for the strength of innovation and access to opportunity.
Switzerland also topped the rankings for best government. It was followed by New Zealand and Denmark in a measure determined by the effectiveness and accountability of lawmakers, the fairness of elections, the participation of people in the political process and rule of law. The highest marks for education went to New Zealand, Australia and Canada.
Luxembourg, the U.S. and Switzerland were graded the best for health treatments and infrastructure as well as preventative care and satisfaction with the service. Iceland, Norway and Finland topped the chart for safety and security; Chad, Congo and Afghanistan ranked the lowest on that index.
Canadians, New Zealanders and Australians enjoy the most freedom and social tolerance, Legatum said. Norway, Denmark and Australia had the highest scores for social capital as monitored by social cohesion and family and community networks