Monday 1 June 2015

my once-peaceful homeland becomes a supporter of genocide

A lot has been said about PM Steven Harper,
of Canada, and most of it is sick, and true. He
has managed to rule over a disengaged and shocked
populace, creating fake terrorist attacks and in
the process abrogating some of the best rights
laws in the world.

Now, it's stated policy has been to support a
particularly violent, apartheid Middle-Eastern
country, to the point that it will pick verbal
fights with anybody who questions that
most evil of countries.

Well, a Palestinian representative used the
biggest Canadian newspaper through which
to castigate Harper and Co. for saying
Palestinians should apologise for dying in
such great numbers, thus embarrassing Canada's
new favourite apartheid state.

Checkit: Globe and Mail


It is John Baird who needs to apologize to the Palestinian people
Contributed to The Globe and Mail (includes correction)
Published Friday, Jan. 16 2015, 12:26 PM EST
Last updated Monday, Jan. 19 2015, 1:42 PM EST
Dr. Saeb Erekat is Palestinian chief negotiator and a member of the Palestine Liberation Organization Executive Committee.
A spokesman for Canadian foreign minister John Baird asked me to apologize to the Israeli government, citing the equivalency I drew between the terror of the self-styled “Islamic State” and that of Israeli settlers who under the banner of a “Jewish State,” and with the backing of their government, have been in a campaign of terror that include the burning of mosques and churches, the destruction of olive groves and the brutal murder of Palestinian civilians.
    ICC opens examination of Israeli-Palestinian conflict
    Swedish minister says Israel irritating allies over Palestine recognition
    Palestinian unity frays, hurting Gaza's rebuilding and statehood aims
After spending the past few years listening to Mr. Baird going out of his way to legitimize the banality and brutality of a 50-year-old Israeli occupation, I tell Mr. Baird: enough. If there is anyone that has to apologize, it is Mr. Baird himself. He should first apologize to his own citizenry, many of whom are God-loving Jews, Christians and Muslims who would never condone nor cheer for an Israeli government that stretches support to Israeli settlers who attack churches and mosques.
Mr. Baird should apologize for his active encouragement of Israel’s brute and ugly occupation and its apartheid policies. He should apologize for failing to promote those things Canadians hold dear such as freedom, dignity and human rights and for replacing those ideals with an outspoken support of Israel’s clear and undisputed violations of international law.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Foreign Minister Baird were elected at a time when the most right-wing extremist government in the history of Israel was elected. Instead of using their sympathies and working relations with Israel to promote peace, they decided to side with those policies which the entire world – including the United States of America – have rejected. Its outspoken support of Israel’s policies has placed Canada in an awkward position within the United Nations system and has radically altered its standing and image in the Arab and Muslim worlds.
The Palestinian leadership has been engaged in a diplomatic effort to obtain those very same ideals Canadians hold dear – to achieve freedom and dignity. We have been working tirelessly to exercise our right to self-determination and establish a state of our own – a state that lives in peace and security with its neighbours, including Israel. But we repeatedly face a stumbling block in the form of an Israeli government more interested in the consolidation of its illegal settlement build-up, rather than in achieving peace with its neighbours.

Against this background, we have tried to widen our political horizon, not through violence, nor through terror, but by employing the tools available to us under international law. Instead of rewarding the Palestinians for their insistence on pursuing peace and for their deep commitment to the stability and security of the region, Mr. Baird has chosen to deride and stand against Palestinians at every corner.

When the UN in 2012 upgraded Palestine’s status from an observer entity to an observer state, it was not the Israeli Foreign Minister who travelled to New York in order to defend Israel’s position; unfortunately, it was Mr. Baird. Though his efforts were and remain largely ineffective (the resolution passed with an overwhelming majority of 138, with only 9 voting against), they came as a slap in the face to Palestinian efforts. Canada also lobbied against our UNESCO membership, a move aimed at protecting and preserving sites of universal value, such as the Nativity Church and the Roman terraces of the village of Battir. Last November, Canada was one of six countries voting against several UN resolutions requesting an Israeli withdrawal from occupied Palestine, and reaffirming the illegality of Israeli policies including the annexation of Occupied East Jerusalem. The six were Canada, the United States, Micronesia, Palau, the Marshall Islands and Israel.

As a matter of fact, while the whole of the international community condemns Israel for its systematic policy of demolishing Palestinian homes and forcibly displacing Palestinians in Occupied East Jerusalem, Mr. Baird has decided to legitimize Israel’s illegal, de facto annexation of the city by meeting an Israeli minister in Occupied East Jerusalem.

While more than a thousand Palestinian civilians were being slaughtered in Gaza, Canada was among the very few countries that encouraged Israel to continue its attack on the besieged territory. Amnesty International had to remind Mr. Baird that “Canadian policy must reflect unwavering commitment to the fundamental international legal principle of civilian protection and must demonstrate equal concern for both Israeli and Palestinian civilians.” Mr. Baird has utterly failed to shape his policy in this way.

But Palestinian lives evidently do not concern Mr. Baird. Yes, those Israeli terrorists who burned alive 16-year-old Muhammad Abu Khdeir in Jerusalem are no different from those Islamic State terrorists who beheaded Steven Sotloff in Syria. Those who actively burn mosques and churches in Palestine, and campaign to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque, are no less terrorists than those who kicked the Christians out of Mosul. But Canada, instead of supporting the application of international law, has decided to encourage Israel to continue with its crimes. As I stated in a letter to Mr. Baird after his meeting in Occupied East Jerusalem: “Canada’s actions are tantamount to complicity in ongoing Israeli violations of the international laws of war.”

We know that the majority of Canadian citizens disagree with their current leadership’s position vis-à-vis Palestine. Some are silent, but others have made their opinions clear, including the thousands who took to the streets of Montreal, Ottawa and Quebec calling for a just and lasting peace.

not all alt media is by alt journalists



Since 2008, I have followed many online news 
sources such as Zerohedge, Max Keiser and
Liberty Blitzkrieg, among others. As I've said 
before, none of these sites has all the answers.
And sometimes, these guys are dead wrong, 
either in their ideas, or in their predictions. But,
if you cross-reference these sources, you will
get a better sense of the truth. 
In this case, Max Keiser used to have a guy
named Jim Rickards on his show. He had 
some interesting revelations about US gov
inner workings. He was an economist (?) and
he was even called in by the Pentagon to 
do an economic war game simulation. And I
thought, "wow, this alt guy was actually on the
inside."
As I discovered later, Keiser was trying to 
squeeze Rickards on issues around the 
11 of the 9th month events in 2001, and 
Rickards was stonewalling. As I slowly
came to see, Rickards was, though 
interesting, pretty much a statist and a big
fan of US power. 
When it came time for the US to chase 
Snowden, I was following Rickards on 
twitter. He wrote something like "we shoulda
shot his plane out of the sky" which, for 
somebody who was a "researcher" is 
bold, and stupid. Before having any 
evidence about Snowden, the US was 
supposed to shoot a plane out of the sky?

As it turns out, a dull German (real) alt-journalist 
named Lars Schall (who has also been on Keiser
and does his own interviews) 
tried to figure out what 
happened with the finances around that 11th
of the 9th that I had mentioned. It seems 
that many government people and assorted
hangers-on had bet heavily on a terrorist 
strike during that time. Rickards had produced
what was supposed to be the definitive alt-journalism
book on the topic. But he was fuzzy on the 
inside part of this job, as regards the financial 
betting. Well, Lars cooked Rickards' goose and
served it to him cold.
Lars could cure insomniacs, but he has 
shown Rickards up.

[here is the proof]
 
Checkit: 
“Informed 9/11 Terror Trading” – Lars Schall Responds To Jim Rickards’ Limited Hangout
Posted on January 2, 2015 by Lars Schall           
In a lecture that he gave in Copenhagen, Denmark, German financial journalist Lars Schall shows that the claim put forward by Wall Street player / bestselling author Jim Rickards that he has been “rigorous and scientific about the evidence” re 9/11 insider trading is merely a lousy joke.
Here you can watch the lecture on “Informed 9/11 Terror Trading”.
Moreover, in addition to my presentation, here’s what Paul Zarembka, Professor for Economics at the State University of New York, has told me about Jim Rickards’ “limited hangout”:
Hi, Lars,
I have now read Rickards’ chapter that you were kind enough to forward.  I don’t see it as even a ‘limited hangout’ of the trading issue unless we reduce that phrase to recognition of good work done by Poteshman and Chesney et al.
Even for those two works, the references are strange.  Poteshman’s is stated to be published by the U. of Chicago, but that is not the way academic publication is cited.  The proper reference is the J. of Business which happens to be published by U. of Chicago for decades.  And Chesney et al’s work is cited without their names and as if the Institute produced it, rather than independent academics employed there.  The author works so closely to intelligence agencies that he is characterizing academic work as if it were administratively like those agencies, i.e., any work is the responsibility of the publisher/agency, not individual scholars.
Anyway, what I think can be learned is that the intelligence agencies are taking insider trading seriously, unlike the Commission Report (who Rickards applauds … except — pp. 25-27 — on insider trading).  On the bottom of p. 23 Rickards indicates that the Commission knew of Poteshman’s work — so why not cite it as “forthcoming” (in appeared in the same year, I believe within one quarter of each other) and deal with it?  (The Commission, of course, also ignored many reports of hijackers being alive after 9-11.)
He raises the issue of signal amplification.  I am not convinced, but if correct, it would imply much less money earned by nefarious characters than would otherwise be the case: much of the earnings would go to those follow like sheep.  In any case, Rickards does not even cite the background, unpublished, work behind the Commission Report which claimed that many of the purchasers of AA options were interviewed and stated that they followed the newsletter that was cited; i.e., whoever they were that were NOT the sheep of alleged signal amplification.
An interesting claim is his assertion that the his system MARKINT flashed “red” on August 7, 2006 for American Airlines.  Unfortunately, Chesney’s work on AA goes only to April 2006 (if I have not missed subsequent work) so we cannot cross-check this.
No where in the chapter is there any evidence provided of WHO were the insider traders. This absence is hardly surprising but needs to be recognized.
Postscriptum @Max Keiser: thank you for asking pretty awkward questions!
Read more at http://www.maxkeiser.com/2015/01/informed-911-terror-trading-lars-schall-responds-to-jim-rickards-limited-hangout/#lrqEkyXFPfyCU0b4.99