Monday 22 July 2013

the USUAL PATRIOTS



I read somebody's comment today that said 
that a corrupt government is worse than the
mafia, just because of the sheer scale of the 
thing.

and who's gonna fix this, more politicians?
I don't think so.

Read a quote from Nietsche today (did I 
spell it right?): There are only 2 kinds of 
people, to politicians, tools and enemies.
Ed Snowden, and the guys below, are 
not tools.

checkit: TECHDIRT
Previous NSA Leakers, Thomas Drake And Mark Klein, Speak Out In Defense Of Ed Snowden
from the confirms-what-they-said dept
As US politicians and pundits push each other aside to tar and feather Ed Snowden for revealing some basic facts about NSA surveillance that the politicians and pundits themselves refused to call out for its clear abuse of basic 4th Amendment principles, two of the most important previous leakers of details of NSA surveillance have spoken out in support of Snowden. Thomas Drake, the former NSA employee who blew the whistle on NSA surveillance abuse (and faced decades in jail on trumped up charges that fell apart in court), has pointed out that Snowden's revelations confirm his own claims from before:
    The NSA programs that Snowden has revealed are nothing new: they date back to the days and weeks after 9/11. I had direct exposure to similar programs, such as Stellar Wind, in 2001. In the first week of October, I had an extraordinary conversation with NSA's lead attorney. When I pressed hard about the unconstitutionality of Stellar Wind, he said:
        "The White House has approved the program; it's all legal. NSA is the executive agent."
    It was made clear to me that the original intent of government was to gain access to all the information it could without regard for constitutional safeguards. "You don't understand," I was told. "We just need the data.
Drake also highlights how he did use the "official" whistleblower channels that many are saying Snowden should have used, and look what happened to him:
    I differed as a whistleblower to Snowden only in this respect: in accordance with the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, I took my concerns up within the chain of command, to the very highest levels at the NSA, and then to Congress and the Department of Defense. I understand why Snowden has taken his course of action, because he's been following this for years: he's seen what's happened to other whistleblowers like me.
    By following protocol, you get flagged – just for raising issues. You're identified as someone they don't like, someone not to be trusted. I was exposed early on because I was a material witness for two 9/11 congressional investigations. In closed testimony, I told them everything I knew – about Stellar Wind, billions of dollars in fraud, waste and abuse, and the critical intelligence, which the NSA had but did not disclose to other agencies, preventing vital action against known threats. If that intelligence had been shared, it may very well have prevented 9/11.
    But as I found out later, none of the material evidence I disclosed went into the official record. It became a state secret even to give information of this kind to the 9/11 investigation.
The end result was that his whistleblowing didn't do much, but he got arrested because he accidentally kept an almost entirely meaningless document about meeting participants in his home. And, when he was arrested, for just having the list of meeting attendees, he was smeared for causing "exceptionally grave damage to US national security."
Separately, former AT&T technician, Mark Klein, who revealed that he helped install NSA equipment directly within AT&T's network is speaking out about how Snowden, rather than the telcos, deserve retroactive immunity. The telcos broke the law and had to have Congress go back and retroactively make what they did -- which clearly broke the law at the time -- legal. Klein points out how his revelations were brushed off and ignored, while Snowden's revelations confirm a lot of what he said:
    "It was clear that the NSA was looking at everything," Klein said. "It wasn't limited to foreign communications."
    On Tuesday, Klein said that for a number of reasons, Snowden's disclosures sparked more public outrage than his own revelations did more than seven years ago.
    For one thing, Klein said, Snowden had direct access to a secret court order and details of the program, while Klein pieced together the government's surveillance through internal AT&T documents and in discussions with colleagues who worked on the project.
    "The government painted me as a nobody, a technician who was merely speculating," said Klein, who made his disclosures after he accepted a buyout and retired from AT&T in 2004. "Now we have an actual copy of a FISA court order. There it is in black and white. It's undisputable. They can't deny that."

Monday 15 July 2013

consumers can do more than roll over

scratch my belly. I'm a good dog.
I do what the advertisers want me to.



I'm stunned how many innocuous companies
have stashed money in the Caymans. This
award thing, below, is supposed to congratulate
good corporate tax citizens, but look closely
at how much subterfuge there is in this list.
Hiding money, unclear ownership of shell companies.

Sick. f%&&cking sicker than a Gregg's pasty.

so, consumers should choose companies that
don't stash your public pension dues in a
tax haven. the money is supposed to
CIRCULATE, not seek the lowest overseas tax
jurisdiction.

so if even the "good guys" 
are skating around the law, 
we're screwed.

checkit: Ifa online


Paying their way: which UK retailer is ‘fairest' on tax?
Author: IFAonline
IFAonline | 13 Jun 2013 | 09:20
A campaign set up to promote transparency in corporate tax affairs has ranked 25 of the UK's largest retailers on the ‘fairness' of their tax contributions.
Fair Tax, set up by Tax Research UK director Richard Murphy, assessed the firms against three metrics - financial reporting, their UK tax rates (and how much is paid on their UK profits) and whether they use tax havens - and gave each a ‘Fair Tax Mark'.
Carphone Warehouse Group, Home Retail Group, J Sainsbury and WH Smith all received a total of two marks out of a possible 15, with the latter marked down for failing to provide a geographical breakdown of its data, despite operating in eight countries.
Other companies to receive low scores included Tesco (4), John Lewis Partnership (5) and Mothercare (6). [NO INFO ON THOSE SCUMBAGS- Costick67]
Here, we rank the top five companies as ranked by Fair Tax:

=5 Marks & Spencer 9
The company provides sales and operating profit plus tax data for its UK operations, but it was marked down for a lack of transparency about the operations of subsidiaries in tax havens including Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Hong Kong.

=5 C&J Clark 9
The shoe manufacturer and retailer provides a detailed breakdown of its profit and tax data, according to Fair Tax, but it received a score of just one for its tax haven use. This is because it only lists some of its subsidiaries.

4 Asos 10
The fashion retailer provides only full aggregated group data, though it breaks down revenues from operations in the UK, EU, USA and the rest of the world. Weighted over six years, ASOS's current tax charge is 7.9% more than the amount of tax expected globally, Fair Tax said, though it does not supply data on its UK profits.

3 Dunelm Group 10
The homewares retailer got top marks for financial reporting and its tax rate (which was within 3% of that expected). However, Fair Tax said the company does not provide a full list of subsidiaries and cannot, therefore, tell whether it uses tax havens.

2 Majestic Wine 14
Fair Tax said the bulk-buy wine giant provides full turnover, profit and tax data for the UK and France, the two countries in which it operates, and pays an appropriate amount of tax on its UK profits. The company does not use tax haven subsidiaries.

1 Greggs 15
Greggs only operates in the UK and supplies full sales, profit and tax data on its operations. Fair Tax said that, weighted over six years, the company has an average current tax rate within 3% of that expected, which has been paid on its appropriate UK profits. It also has no tax haven subsidiaries.
Read more: http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/ifaonline/feature/2274641/paying-their-way-which-uk-retailer-is-fairest-on-tax#ixzz2W66PusaE

OUR ENEMIES are …EVERYBODY



How is it Edward Snowden is an enemy of the state?
He gave information to the enemies of the US? as
Obama said?
Like whom?
Maybe he actually opened the world's eyes and minds. 
Enemas do that, not enemies.
He showed us that the enemies of the US gubment are 
everybody, even its own self & most of its populace.
This is what the US government is "telling us" when 
they attack Snowden's right to free speech and his
right to asylum. 
But not the companies that are
contracted to spy on everybody. 
How can you keep your illegal spying activity 
secret when your grunt workers are business 
contractors? That's how Snowden got in. 
Booze Allen Hill is the company.
[ready for your enema?]

There's more than enough proof that the US 
gov is out of control.

checkit: Hullabaloo
This really is Big Brother: the leak nobody's noticed
by digby
This McClatchy piece (written by some of the same people who got the Iraq war run-up story so right while everyone else got it wrong) is as chilling to me as anything we've heard over the past few weeks about the NSA spying. In fact, it may be worse:
    Even before a former U.S. intelligence contractor exposed the secret collection of Americans’ phone records, the Obama administration was pressing a government-wide crackdown on security threats that requires federal employees to keep closer tabs on their co-workers and exhorts managers to punish those who fail to report their suspicions.
    President Barack Obama’s unprecedented initiative, known as the Insider Threat Program, is sweeping in its reach. It has received scant public attention even though it extends beyond the U.S. national security bureaucracies to most federal departments and agencies nationwide, including the Peace Corps, the Social Security Administration and the Education and Agriculture departments. It emphasizes leaks of classified material, but catchall definitions of “insider threat” give agencies latitude to pursue and penalize a range of other conduct.
    Government documents reviewed by McClatchy illustrate how some agencies are using that latitude to pursue unauthorized disclosures of any information, not just classified material. They also show how millions of federal employees and contractors must watch for “high-risk persons or behaviors” among co-workers and could face penalties, including criminal charges, for failing to report them. Leaks to the media are equated with espionage.
    “Hammer this fact home . . . leaking is tantamount to aiding the enemies of the United States,” says a June 1, 2012, Defense Department strategy for the program that was obtained by McClatchy.
When the free free press, explicitly protected in the bill of rights becomes equivalent to an "enemy of the United States" something very, very bad is happening.
….[NOW TO F$^&KING SCARE YOU- Costick 67]    The Pentagon established its own sweeping definition of an insider threat as an employee with a clearance who “wittingly or unwittingly” harms “national security interests” through “unauthorized disclosure, data modification, espionage, terrorism, or kinetic actions resulting in loss or degradation of resources or capabilities.”
    “An argument can be made that the rape of military personnel represents an insider threat. Nobody has a model of what this insider threat stuff is supposed to look like,” said the senior Pentagon official, explaining that inside the Defense Department “there are a lot of chiefs with their own agendas but no leadership.”
    The Department of Education, meanwhile, informs employees that co-workers going through “certain life experiences . . . might turn a trusted user into an insider threat.” Those experiences, the department says in a computer training manual, include “stress, divorce, financial problems” or “frustrations with co-workers or the organization.”
[DOES THIS SOUND LIKE A MOVIE TRAILER?- Costick 67]
    The Bush administration allegedly tried to silence two former government climate change experts from speaking publicly on the dangers of global warming. More recently, the FDA justified the monitoring of the personal email of its scientists and doctors as a way to detect leaks of unclassified information.
Maybe this is just another way of reducing the federal workforce. Nobody normal should want to work there.
When the Department of Education is searching for "insider threats" something's gone very wrong.
[AS EvERYTHING CRUMBLES AROUND THEIR HEADS- Costick67]

2 Usahitman

CIA whistleblower to Snowden: ‘Do not cooperate with the FBI’
NSA leaker Edward Snowden is the subject of an open letter of support just published from behind bars by John Kiriakou, a former CIA agent currently serving time for sharing state secrets.
In a letter dated June 13 and published Tuesday by Firedoglake, the imprisoned CIA vet salutes Snowden for his recent disclosures of classified documents detailing some of the vast surveillance programs operated by the United States’ National Security Agency.
“Thank you for your revelations of government wrongdoing over the past week,” Kiriakou writes. “You have done the country a great public service.”
“I know that it feels like the weight of the world is on your shoulders right now, but as Americans begin to realize that we are devolving into a police state, with the loss of civil liberties that entails, they will see your actions for what they are: heroic.”
Beginning with the June 6 publication of a dragnet court order demanding the phone data of millions of Americans, The Guardian newspaper has released a collection of leaked documents attributed to Snowden for which the US government has charged him with espionage. He is reportedly now hiding in a Moscow airport and has sought asylum from no fewer than 20 countries to avoid prosecution in the US. Should he be sent home and forced to stand trial, however, Snowden will likely find himself in a peculiar position that the former Central Intelligence Agency analyst can most certainly relate to: Kiriakou is currently serving a 36-month sentence at the Loretto, Pennsylvania federal prison for revealing the identity of a covert CIA agent to reporters.
Before Kiriakou pleaded guilty to one count of passing classified information to the media last year, the government charged him under the Espionage Act of 1917. He has equated the prosecution as retaliation for his own past actions, saying the charge wasn’t the result of outing a secret agent but over exposing truths about the George W. Bush administration’s use of waterboarding as an interrogation tool in the post-9/11 war on terror. As in the case of Snowden, Kiriakou’s supporters have hailed him as a whistleblower. As the government sings a very different song, though, the CIA analyst offers advice to Snowden in what is the second of his “Letters from Loretto” published by Firedoglake since Kiriakou’s two-and-a-half-year sentence began earlier this spring.
“First, find the best national security attorneys money can buy,” writes Kiriakou. “I was blessed to be represented by legal titans and, although I was forced to take a plea in the end, the shortness of my sentence is a testament to their expertise.”
“Second, establish a website that your supporters can follow your case, get your side of the story and, most importantly, make donations to support your defense.”
Kiriakou goes on to encourage Snowden toward garnering support within members of Congress and other institutions capable of calling attention to his case, such as the American Civil Liberties Union. Before he concludes, however, he bestows on Snowden what he calls “the most important advice I can offer.”
DO NOT, under any circumstances, cooperate with the FBI,” Kiriakou warns. “FBI agents will lie, trick and deceive you. They will twist your words and play on your patriotism to entrap you. They will pretend to be people they are not — supporters, well-wishers and friends — all the while wearing wires to record your out-of-context statements to use against you. The FBI is the enemy; it’s a part of the problem, not the solution.”
“I wish you the very best of luck,” Kiriakou writes before signing off. “I hope you can get to Iceland quickly and safely. There you will find a people and a government who care about the freedoms that we hold dear and for which our forefathers and veterans fought and died.”
When Snowden first revealed himself to be the source of the leaked documents last month, murmurings quickly began circulating of Iceland possibly extending his way an offer of asylum. The list of countries asked to consider his request reportedly now exceeds 20, and the likes of Ecuador, Bolivia, Cuba and Switzerland have all been floated as options. As Firedoglake’s Kevin Gosztola recalls, though, the Federal Bureau of Investigation likely won’t rule out dirty tricks to try and take down Snowden before he escapes, at least if Kiriakou’s experiences are any indication.
“According to Kiriakou, the FBI also tried to set him up,” Gosztola writes. He goes on to cite a January 2013 interview in which the CIA whistleblower recounted a previously untold story about the government’s alleged efforts to indict Kiriakou on even more charges.
“In the summer of 2010, a foreign intelligence officer offered me cash in exchange for classified information,” Kiriakou said. “I turned down the pitch and I immediately reported it to the FBI. So, the FBI asked me to take the guy out to lunch and to ask him what information he wanted and how much information he was willing to give me for it.”
“After the lunch, I wrote a long memo to the FBI — and I did this four or five times. It turns out – and we only learned this three or four weeks ago – there never was a foreign intelligence officer. It was an FBI agent pretending to be an intelligence officer and they were trying to set me up on an Espionage Act charge but I repeatedly reported the contact so I foiled them in their effort to set me up.”
Kiriakou is one of eight Americans charged under that World War One-era legislation by President Barack Obama, who has prosecuted more people under that law that all previous leaders combined. Snowden became the latest US citizen to have their name added to that list and joins the likes of WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning and NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake. In a question-and-answer session hosted by The Guardian last month, Snowden celebrated those men as “examples of how overly-harsh responses to public-interest whistle-blowing only escalate the scale, scope and skill involved in future disclosures.”
“Citizens with a conscience are not going to ignore wrong-doing simply because they’ll be destroyed for it: the conscience forbids it. Instead, these draconian responses simply build better whistleblowers. If the Obama administration responds with an even harsher hand against me, they can be assured that they’ll soon find themselves facing an equally harsh public response,” Snowden said.
In his first statement since entering Moscow more than a week ago, Snowden published a note through WikiLeaks on Monday dismissing the White House’s hunt for leakers, calling their tactics deceptive, unjust and “bad tools of political aggression.”
“In the end the Obama administration is not afraid of whistleblowers like me, Bradley Manning or Thomas Drake. We are stateless, imprisoned or powerless. No, the Obama administration is afraid of you. It is afraid of an informed, angry public demanding the constitutional government it was promised — and it should be,” Snowden wrote.