Saturday 22 January 2011

vampire squid are banker dopelgangers

[gonna get me-self stuck on Facebook]

vampire squid are similar to bankers for many reasons.

1) they can turn inside out
2) they're not what people say they are
3) they're blood-sucking killers

1
inside out
the vampire squid
In order to hide from predators, it takes its limbs and slips them over its head.
the vampire banker
he's a ruthless capitalist who will steal from his own mother. No thought to helping the poor that he steps over on the street.
'they have to get up and be a self-made man like me' they say.
They're all hookered up and coked up, the 911 in the garage...
Until they lose their shirts in the markets.
Then they become socialists,
crying about how they're so important to society
when the provide nothing, and shift papers around all day.

2
who am I? I don't know
the vampire squid
it's actually a cephalopod, not a squid.
the vampire banker
people say they are just providing a necessary function for society,
providing liquidity for the markets.
Actually, they exist to destroy democracy by taking all the money,
baiting the politicians with bribes and then telling them what to do
3
I vant your blood!
the vampire squid
well, you don't get called vampire for nothing
the vampire banker
now that they've destroyed the cash, bond, derivative, and most of the hedge
market, they're speculating on other stuff, because the governments of the world
keep giving them free money. Loans with 0.25% interest.
Governments are doing this because they've been told to do this.
If they don't give the banks free money, they'll collapse.
So, they speculate on oil, wheat, corn and now chocolate.
the chocolate mafia (see my other tasty story)
that's the paper price, on the futures markets.
So, in essence, they force up the real price of food
for the poor of the world, who spend most of their income
on keeping alive.
There have already been riots in several countries
Tunisia, India, South America.
-Costick67 ~(8^P
checkitout:

1 zerohedge.com
JP Morgan corners the market in chocolate
all they need is a civil war.
off we go to Ivory Coast

"Bond Recoveries Or Chocolate": Ivory Coast Issues Ultimatum With Cocoa Export Ban, As Chocolate Prices Set To Surge Monday

Submitted by Tyler Durden on Jan23/2011 14:43 -0500

When a week ago we observed the Onionesque reality of life in the Ivory Coast, where deposed president Gbagbo is threatening to wipe out bondholders of $2.3 billion in debt (Corporate Ticker: NUTZ) unless he becomes formally recognized, we made the following bold prediction: "we are sure that Blythe Masters and her team were recently in Yamoussoukro discussing the most effective way to corner the cocoa market (paper Cocoa ETF?), thus getting the price of the sweet powder up by a few trillion percent (in exchange for a nice 25% of all upside going to Jamie Dimon's firm of course)." Sure enough, when it comes to our track record of macabre predictions we continue to be near 100%. The FT has just reported that Alassane Ouattara, Laurent Gbagbo's opponent in the presidential election (and the man formally acknowledged by the UN as the country's president) has just imposed a one-month export ban of cocoa, ostensibly in an attempt to oust Laurent Gbagbo. In other words, the international community has to choose: bond recoveries or chocolate. That said, we are certain that it is none other than noted commodity market cornering expert JPM that can claim league table advisory credit for what according to the FT will be a 10% jump in the price of cocoa on opening Monday. The immediate retaliation by Gbagbo will most certainly be to force a technical default on the country's bonds which are already in their grace period, and start a localized mini liquidity (and solvency) crisis in Africa... As if the developed world did not have enough of those as is. And in the meantime, we sense a great disturbance in the inflationary Force, as if millions of fatty voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. Prepare for the next round of food inflation worldwide. [and so on] at:
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/bond-recoveries-or-chocolate-ivory-coast-issues-ultimatum-cocoa-export-ban-chocolate-prices-

2 from business insider
vampire squid on your face...book

Billionaire Jim Clark: "The Goldman-Facebook Deal Is Just Another Way For The Firm To Make Money From Its Clients"
Courtney Comstock | Jan. 24, 2011, 6:01 PM | 4,788 | comment 14
clark-hintzeAfter everything that's happened, Goldman Sachs probably wishes it had never pitched 70-year old billionaire Jim Clark (the founder of Netscape) on the firm's big Facebook deal.
The billionaire founder and investor told Bloomberg Markets Magazine that when he got the pitch email from Goldman, he was instantly "irked."
Now, he's going after Goldman for pitching him on Facebook with a bad price and high fees on top of it, just meant to rob him of more money. And he's spilling tons of details that Goldman probably doesn't want its investors to know -- including the fact that he received a better offer for Facebook elsewhere. And how his Goldman brokers called John Paulson a "bit player" in 2006.
Not surprisingly, the firm "declined to make Blankfein or any other executives available for comment for this story."
Clark definitely has a grudge. Goldman already lost him a lot of money, he says. In 2009, he "angrily" yanked most of the $400 million he had invested in GSAM, Goldman's asset management unit.

and 3 from zerohedge.com

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-goldman-sachs-vampire-squid-facebook%E2%80%99s-face

Guest Post: Is Goldman Sachs A Vampire Squid On Facebook’s Face?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/26/2011 12:47 -0500

Submitted by Wall St. Cheat Sheet

Is Goldman Sachs a Vampire Squid on Facebook’s Face?

There’s confidence, then there’s bravado.

Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) is acting more insecure than ever with an incredibly pompous payment structure for private placement shares of social networking site Facebook. According to Bloomberg Markets Magazine (via Business Insider), the investment banking deal doesn’t have only placement agent fees, it also includes a Vampire Squid Clause:

The firm would levy a 4% placement fee on clients, plus a .5% “expense reserve” fee. It would also require investors to surrender 5% of any profits, known as “carried interest,” according to a Goldman Sachs document.