of the finest order. Then she became a host on RT of a
kick-ass anti-establishment show.
Then she tried to scold Putin about Crimea. She was
sent to Siberia instead and hasn't been heard from since.
Just kidding.
I really do like Abby because she is somebody you can
read, like she's really human out there. I'll post some of
her interesting human moments.
Her other colleague at RT, some midwestern broad,
tried to flip off RT and flip it into a network job in the
US. I hope you like NBC in North Dakota. At least
it's not Gitmo.
Here she introduces a guy who was a very important
investigator whom I hadn't known. Watch this -->
IMO, MC Rupert suffered from the same kind of vivid
impression of life that Philip K Dick had, who also
committed suicide.
Next, with her favourite chick friend Amber Lyon, 4:30
tough, hot, investigative gals. it's luv.
Here, she does what Twitter is so good at, reminding
us of every death caused by the Isr genocide>
Read 'em: Intercept
RT Host Abby Martin Condemns Russian Incursion Into Crimea – On RT
By Glenn Greenwald 4 Mar 2014, 7:26 AM EST 161
Featured photo - RT Host Abby Martin Condemns Russian Incursion Into Crimea – On RT Screenshot: RT host Abby Martin condemns the Russian military action in Crimea, March 3, 2014
The vast bulk of the commentary issuing from American commentators about the Russian military action in Ukraine involves condemning exactly that which they routinely advocate and which the U.S. itself routinely does. So suffocating is the resulting stench that those who played leading roles in selling the public the attack on Iraq and who are still unrepentant about it, such as David “Axis of Evil/The Right Man” Frum, have actually become the leading media voices condemning Russia on the ground that it is wrong to invade sovereign countries; Frum thus has no trouble saying things like this with an apparently straight face: “If Russia acts the outlaw nation, can it be expected to be treated as anything but an outlaw?”
Enthusiastic supporters of a wide range of other U.S. interventions in sovereign states, both past and present and in and out of government, are equally righteous in their newfound contempt for invasions – when done by Russia. Secretary of State John Kerry – who stood on the Senate floor in 2002 and voted to authorize the invasion of Iraq because “Saddam Hussein [is] sitting in Baghdad with an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction” and there is “little doubt that Saddam Hussein wants to retain his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction” – told Face the Nation on Sunday: “You just don’t in the 21st Century behave in 19th Century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped-up pretext.” The supremely sycophantic Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer – as he demanded to know how Russia would be punished – never once bothered Kerry (or his other Iraq-war-advocating guests, including Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius) by asking about any of that unpleasantness (is it hard at all for you to sermonize against invasions of sovereign countries given, you know, how often you yourself support them?)....
