We know that governments have to reign in their expenses,
because the banks are broke* and governments "can't get money"*.
Of course, at the same time, we’ve decided to bail out the banks,
so they're not broke, not in a bankruptcy sort of way.
If we killed off some banks and reigned in the rest,
then people would support cuts in government expenses.
That's even though the cuts in public services, though very
harmful, can in no possible f^&%^king way pay off the
massive stinking, pile of sh"t debts that every country
has on its books. But, I digress.
It would be necessary, in killing off those banks that we lose
some or all of our national debts, in order to balance things.
Bankers would swallow it, because they’re short-termists anyway
(the ultimate businessmen). All they care about is their
individual fees.
The fact that their banks will get robbed doesn’t concern
any of them.
It’s the bonus, shithead.
*we know it's bullshit, but that's what they say
