It's not good enough for rich people and their corporations in the US
to have legal, free reign to buy and sell politicians (they
choose the winner anyway) because now politicians are telling
the public who is funding them.
Rich folk don't want to be seen buying politicians. Or, so they say.
I think they don't want to be seen giving millions to the guy who
is going to lose (Mitt Romney), because some people might
say "he's a Republican. I'm switching my business to the other guy".
trophy wife, and Maybach
them wagging (what is in reality a very small) dick around.
It's a guy thing.
Let Mira explain (5:40):
also check the line at 4:00 about married guys. These two clips are why she got the Oscar.
They gave it to her and parked it between her big tits.
IshitUnot: BillMoyers.com / By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship
Pity the Poor Billionaires: Ultra-Rich Whine About Having Their Massive Campaign Donations Exposed
Since 1979, 377 members of the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans have given almost half a billion dollars to candidates of both parties, most of it in the last decade.
We had the perfect headline all picked out for this piece but our colleague Paul Waldman at The American Prospect magazine beat us to the punch:
“It’s Hard Out There for a Billionaire.”
You see, according to Politico.com, the so-called “mega-donors,” unleashed by Citizens United and pouring boundless big bucks into this year’s political campaigns, are upset that their massive contributions are being exposed to public view, ignoring the right of every one of us to know who is giving money to candidates — and the opportunity to try to figure out why.
“Quit picking on us” is part of Politico’s headline. Their article says that the mega-donors’ “six- and seven-figure contributions have… bought them nothing but grief.”
