Are you Syria's?

I like the fact that there seems to be a solid-looking
agreement to stop hostilities of the imperial kind.
There's no stopping the funding of the rebels, but
that's life.That just means that someone will find
other means to their ends. Probably some US
senators with PTSD (McCain Frites).

As for the reasons for this conflict. There are
apparently at least two we know about:

-a Saudi gas pipeline to Europe, as per Max Keiser:


-a banking clique, as per JSKim (from Twitter):
SmartKnowledgeU • 1,232 like this
#thrive: "when 911 happened, there were 7 major
countries not going along w/the Rothschild banking
system. Now there’s only 2." #bankingtruth
[one of them is Syria. I assume one convert was Iraq]


It can be both. It's when too many interests are
hanging around that you know you're dead meat.

Haliburton, M&I&C, control of oil markets,
surrounding Iran, Rothschilds. these are some of the things
which did in Iraq.

Opium, copper, oil pipelines, co-opting the Stans.
These are some of the things that did it for
Afghanistan

It's never one thing. The neo-liberal economists
and business types are right behind the army,
looking over their shoulder.
Sometimes, like in the Eurozone, an army isn't
even necessary, as the societies have been
pacified by reams of treaty paper (soft& quilted)

The businesses of the big countries wait for their
chance to overrun Euro countries and shove out
the unions, the mom & pop stores, the small
factories; everything that makes an independent
economy tick.

Greece is a key example, not because of its size,
but because of it's economic make-up.
e.g. The pharmacies are limited by a pharmacists'
union, and that is keeping international "drug
dealers" from  getting a foothold. Letting them in
would destroy hundreds of small businesses and
make every pharma grad into an employee.

The government has periodically withheld the
health system money that they owe to the pharmacists
in order to break the back of the union, but have still
not succeeded.