Sunday 19 August 2012

only extremist zealots would storm an embassy

Never a government of the first world.

Leave it to Iranian 'students' who were theocratically
minded and pissed off at having a British puppet Shah,
who was sat on a throne simply to expropriate, for
Britain, the oil of Iran.
But still, those are not good reasons to ignore diplomatic
protocol.

However, laws in the UK are kind of rubbery, as I'm discovering.

Firstly, Assange was jailed even though he was
not charged with anything by Britain, or by Sweden.
So, he was bailed, even though bail is for somebody
who is awaiting trial. Assange is awaiting questioning.
Now that it's a EuroPol warrant, I guess the whole of
the EU/EC is involved in bending its own rules to make Assange
an internal exile until his rendition to the US comes up. See what
happens when you mess with diplomats???
They'll f^&&king gulag your ass.
They know where all the bodies are buried.
They know all the "stateless" places on the planet,
where no human rights apply.

I've finally understood the
"Sweden wants you for questioning" gambit. 
They can't ask you in the UK because of
"the circumstances",
as I heard on the radio today.
The question they want to ask is
"do you want to spend time in Swedish jail, or gitmo?"
What that means-
Assange goes to Sweden
Sweden gives him an ultimatum-
"plead guilty to sex assault and spend 20.
OR, we'll release you 
and that may mean the Americans will pick U up.
It's out of our hands. 
In fact, they're right outside, 
swinging handcuffs
off the ends of their fingers."

"circumstances" are being readied and so they're being circumspect.
Australia, of all countries, is prepping for Assange's rendition. So,
even your neighbour's dog knew about the US gitmo plan.

read 'em:
1

[TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN, MATE
And Assange is that Kangaroo, fresh from the 
kangaroo courts of London]:

Hang the Bankers
Australia prepping ‘contingency plan’ for Assange US extradition
19 Aug 2012
by Jacque Fresco
Australian officials have confirmed that the country’s diplomatic mission in Washington has been prepareing for Julian Assange’s possible extradition to the US, but called it “contingency planning.”
The country’s authorities say there is nothing unusual in the move, as the must be ready for all eventualities.
“The embassy is doing its job, just to be in a position to advise the government if it believed that an extradition effort was imminent. There is no evidence of such an extradition effort,” Trade Minister Craig Emerson told ABC television.
2
[ANYBODY STILL CONFUSED ABOUT THE SWEDEN/US LINK?
US PREEMPTIVE STRIKES ON ECUADOR. DELIVERED BY US SPOKESMEDIA]
Reuters
US trade benefits for Ecuador seen at risk in Assange case
Tue, Aug 14 16:52 PM EDT
* US began annual review of Ecuador trade benefits last week
* Ecuador exported about $1.7 bln of goods to US under program in 2011
* Chevron has pressed for trade benefits to be revoked
By Doug Palmer
WASHINGTON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - An possible decision this week by Ecuador to grant political asylum to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange would put long-time U.S. trade benefits for the Andean country at risk, U.S. business leaders and analysts said.
"It's not a move destined to win many new friends in Washington," said Eric Farnsworth, vice president at the Council of Americas, a group representing U.S. companies that do business in the Western Hemisphere.
Chevron Corp. and many U.S. business groups are already urging the White House to suspend Ecuador's trade benefits under the Andean Trade Preferences Act, which dates back to the early 1990s.
Human rights group, in another sign of eroding support in Washington for Ecuador, also have raised concerns about Correa's clamp down on the media, said Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue, a think tank focused on U.S. relations with Latin America. [REUTERS IS NOT CONTROLLED. IT COMPLIES]
...[HERE’S THE FULL REPORT ON BLIATERAL BUSINESS]
OIL AND MANGOES

Ecuador exported about $1.7 billion worth of goods to the United States under the program in 2011, mainly $1.6 billion of petroleum products. That was down sharply from $4.2 billion in 2010, partly reflecting an eight-month expiration of the program while the U.S. Congress and the Obama administration bickered over a number of trade concerns.

Other important exports for Ecuador under the program include cut flowers and fruits such as mangoes and pineapples.

The program will expire again next July unless Congress votes to renew it. In addition, the Obama administration could suspend Ecuador's benefits sooner if it decides Quito is not meeting the program's eligibility requirements.
...[MAYBE CHEVRON IS BIASED] Over the past several months, a number of U.S. business groups have already weighed in with such recommendations.

Most are based in part on Chevron Corp.'s long-running legal battle with Ecuador over pollution blamed on Texaco, which Chevron purchased in 2001.

An Ecuador court ruled against Chevron in February 2011 and last week damages stemming from that hotly-contested decision were increased to $19 billion from $18.2 billion.
 Chevron says Texaco settled the case with Ecuador in 1998 and the new ruling against it was obtained by fraud.
 3
[SWEDEN's WARM AS A CARDIGAN LEGAL SYSTEM. 
FAVOURITE GAME? rendition]
Anniemachon.ch
The Assange Witch Hunt
Posted on August 16, 2012
A storm of dip­lo­matic sound and fury has broken over Ecuador’s decision to grant polit­ical asylum to Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange. The UK gov­ern­ment has threatened to breach all dip­lo­matic pro­tocol and inter­na­tional law and go into the embassy to arrest Assange.
Many people in the west­ern media remain puzzled about Assange’s fear of being held cap­tive in the Swedish legal sys­tem. But can we really trust Swedish justice when it has been flag­rantly politi­cised and manip­u­lated in the Assange case, as has been repeatedly well doc­u­mented. Indeed, the Swedish justice sys­tem has the highest rate per cap­ita of cases taken to the ECtHR for flout­ing Art­icle 6 — the right to a fair trial.
If Assange were extra­dited merely for ques­tion­ing by police — he has yet to be even charged with any crime in Sweden — there is a strong risk that the Swedes will just shove him straight on the next plane to the US under the legal terms of a “tem­por­ary sur­render”. And in the US, a secret Grand Jury has been con­vened in Vir­ginia to find a law — any law — with which to pro­sec­ute Assange.  Hell, if the Yanks can’t find an exist­ing law, they will prob­ably write a new one just for him.